Archive for the ‘social.justice’ Category

honor.the.sabbath

Reminder: I’ve moved to herbhalstead.me

For some time now, I have been exploring Sabbath. What I mean is that I’ve been reading and meditating on what Sabbath is supposed to be, asking myself, “what does God hope to achieve with Sabbath?” I’ve long wrestled with the relationship between priest (pastor) and Sabbath.

“Or haven’t you read in the Law that on the Sabbath the priests in the temple desecrate the day and yet are innocent?” (Matthew 12:5)

God’s call on the priesthood is to do the work of a priest on the Sabbath. Considering the strict Hebrew sensibilities concerning Sabbath, it seems to be quite a privilege to work on the Sabbath. I remember the first time I was asked to publicly pray during a church service – I was a young married father. At once, my fear of public speaking produced an elevated heart rate, and hyper-ventilating. But something else was there too…

[ continue reading ]

Posted by pastorherb on July 22nd, 2010 No Comments

earn.this

Reminder: I’ve moved to herbhalstead.me

I just posted a new blog post at my new blog home. Here is an excerpt:

One of my favorite war movies is “Saving Private Ryan”, the story of a small band of soldiers who reluctantly follow orders to find and extract the single survivor of 4 brothers – the other three brothers were killed in action. They find the remaining brother and enter into a suicidal mission to hold a bridge before they can return with him. In the end, almost all of the band of rescuers dies. In a riveting scene, the squad leader forces his final words through his final breaths. He says to Private Ryan, “Earn this.”

The crazy thing about God’s grace and mercy is that it was given before I deserved it. Like those soldiers, Jesus gave his life for me in advance of my reaction to it. I did not, and cannot “earn” (in any way) what he willingly did for me. He gave himself freely and I do not deserve the gift. Besides, can you “earn” something that was already given?

[ To read the rest, click here ]

Posted by pastorherb on June 23rd, 2010 No Comments

the.middle.way

“Via Media” - the middle way. It is a term used by John Wesley. Somewhere, between two extremes lies a middle way. Not a compromise, per se - but an intentional meeting of the minds - a reconciliation of ideas.

In his time, the via media was a way to seek restoration between the status quo and a reactionary revolution called “The Reformation”. Catholicism was, at one time, the only game in Jesus Town. But, as people used the gospel as a hammer to exploit people and pursue a political agenda, Martin Luther stood up in reaction to these corruptions and birthed “The Reformation”. The reformation was a reaction to the corruption of Catholicism. The problem is that it threw the baby out with the bath water. By the time John Wesley came around the battle lines were strongly drawn - and quite polarized. He wanted Anglicanism, the primary reformists haven of the time, to pursue a “via media”.

The “via media” is not compromise. It is a synergistic approach that requires honest reflection on the polar positions. It says, “hey, I sill believe what I believe, but perhaps I’ve been too hyperbolic.” To pursue a judgment on the question of who is right and who is wrong is, well, the wrong way to go about things. It will debase the conversation, turning it into a match of proof quoting prowess - the one who can quote the most wins. The real pursuit should be, “We both have incredible scriptural support, so how can we learn from each perspective and arrive at what must be the truth” - encompassing both viewpoints in beautiful harmony. “Via media” is not compromise because the result is greater than its former parts.

If Wesley were alive today, where would his pursuit of “via media” be?

Would it be between compassionate ministries and social justice? The latter is a reaction to perceived inadequacies of the former.

Would it be between the traditional church and the emergent church? The latter is a reaction to perceived inadequacies of the former.

I think it would be both. He would seek “via media” in all that divides the church. While he was dealing with the issues between Catholicism and the Reformists, he was also dealing with his doctrine of Holiness and his allegiance to Anglicanism.

Every revolution begins with a status quo, resulting in a reaction. Eventually the dust settles and we discover “via media”. The via media is not a war between two ideas, but a convergence into a greater idea from both.

What would happen if we, who call ourselves the Bride of Christ, chose to pursue a life of “via media” rather than seeking a pole to which we can chain ourselves?

Posted by pastorherb on June 15th, 2010 3 Comments